Is it better to be single - Page 2 - REVmatch

DTM · #26 03-24-2005, 09:27 PM

i wonder if its possible to get the anti radar paint on some airforce aircraft....

crazyvolvo · #27 03-24-2005, 10:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bcflick

Is there anyone out there faster than the laser???? Or like a special wax that takes the beam and bounces it right off??? Or instead of jamming the radar gun, sends a signal back destroying the thing??? I'd by two of those...

Alright you got two options and together they make your car %99.999999999 invisible to laser

! First you need the best jammer out there, The Blinder Xtreme laser jammer, which jams all laser and doesn't send any jamming codes, also you need VEIL Stealth Coating. If you have a light colored car, i would recommend a bra.
BLinders Website
VEIL Stealth Coating

With that combo you are invisible to laser!
Lastest test done on VEIL!
Test between Escort jammer and Blinder

Defcon Dale · #28 03-24-2005, 11:48 PM

If a cop wants to give you a ticket.... he will , no matter what his radar reads ..my lesson was learned ;-/

crazyvolvo · #29 03-25-2005, 12:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Defcon Dale

If a cop wants to give you a ticket.... he will , no matter what his radar reads ..my lesson was learned ;-/

but with out radar or laser speed reading...tickets should be fought and they will be thrown out

bcflick · #30 03-25-2005, 12:23 AM

Thanks for the info Crazyvolvo... I'll have to try some of that stuff out... They actually have a shop not too far from me... I'll probably check them out this weekend... OH crap.. easter's coming up fast...

yemeneee · #31 03-25-2005, 02:36 AM

well i broke up with my ex gf in may before going to the rally, and glad i did that.. i mean i was going to do it with other chicks anyway but i didn't have to feel bad at the end..

einraz · #32 03-25-2005, 05:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by yemeneee

well i broke up with my ex gf in may before going to the rally, and glad i did that.. i mean i was going to do it with other chicks anyway but i didn't have to feel bad at the end..

hahahahahahahahaha

1fstchic · #33 03-25-2005, 08:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by yemeneee

well i broke up with my ex gf in may before going to the rally, and glad i did that.. i mean i was going to do it with other chicks anyway but i didn't have to feel bad at the end..

Atleast you broke up with her first... always a better idea to be single if you plan on fooling around anyway.....

bcflick · #34 03-25-2005, 09:35 PM

Being single for the Rally - It really depends on what you plan on doing..
-Getting drunk everynight and waking in strange places.. you might want to be single...
-Out having a good time, but know your limits... single or taken

Why Cheat... would you want your GF / BF cheating on you? If not don't cheat on them. If so... ooohhh that's kinky... Now if your GF / BF knows about it and accepts you doing these actions..., it's not considered cheating that is catagorized as experimenting. Watch out for sarcasium though... but you have to clearly tell your GF/BF you are planing on doing... so on, so forth...

What if your GF/BF joins in??? or watches from a closet??? has a video camera setup for later viewing???

**Chris** · #35 03-25-2005, 10:25 PM

Meh

SupraSeb · #36 03-27-2005, 09:28 PM

If you mean single turbo then of course

-Seb

**Chris** · #37 03-28-2005, 02:31 AM

Yes, that is what I am doing.

Nico · #38 04-03-2005, 03:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crazyvolvo

but with out radar or laser speed reading...tickets should be fought and they will be thrown out

Not necessarily, I was able to successfully discredit the radar reading of a speedtrap while riding my bike, but the cop said he first guestimated my speed visually, and had training records to qualify him in this capacity. So the judge ruled in favor of the officer for this reason solely. So if a cop is qualified to visually identify the speed of a moving vehicle, then that can be enough to bolster their case against you. Bullshit, I know.

einraz · #39 04-04-2005, 07:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nico

Not necessarily, I was able to successfully discredit the radar reading of a speedtrap while riding my bike, but the cop said he first guestimated my speed visually, and had training records to qualify him in this capacity. So the judge ruled in favor of the officer for this reason solely. So if a cop is qualified to visually identify the speed of a moving vehicle, then that can be enough to bolster their case against you. Bullshit, I know.

You could always say the cop smelled of whiskey.